Skip to content
Vision Culture UK

Venezuela Is Poised to Shape Trump's Political Legacy - and America's Place in the Global Order

Following launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building business.

In a striking news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US forces had successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a group featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" entails is uncertain, but the vow signifies an sudden shift in direction for the president, rife with contradictions and daunting challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now gambling his administration on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He vowed to enlist American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – whether for good or ill.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is quite prepared to use armed force worldwide.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be difficult for some of Trump's supporters to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's endless use of force and backing for foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "firm and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, land and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise larger concerns in global politics, however, and affect American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were sharper.

"America should not be managing other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with zero American deaths and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that success continuing, as the US claims it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

Written by

Joseph Henry

Elara Vance is a London-based art critic and curator with over a decade of experience in visual arts and cultural commentary.

Vision Culture UK

Type to search articles.